Tirzepatide vs Semaglutide: The Head-to-Head Data Explained

It's the question everyone asks: Tirzepatide or semaglutide? Zepbound or Wegovy? Mounjaro or Ozempic? Which one is "better"?

We finally have an answer—or at least, we have direct comparison data. The SURMOUNT-5 trial put both medications head-to-head in the same patients for the first time. Combined with data from the SURPASS-2 diabetes trial and years of individual studies, we can now make evidence-based comparisons.

The short answer: tirzepatide produces more weight loss. But the full picture is more nuanced than headlines suggest.

The Headline Numbers: SURMOUNT-5

SURMOUNT-5 is the trial everyone was waiting for. It randomized 751 adults with obesity (no diabetes) to receive either tirzepatide or semaglutide for 72 weeks. Same patients, same conditions, direct comparison.

Tirzepatide

15mg max dose

VS

Semaglutide

2.4mg max dose

20.2%
Average Weight Loss
13.7%
31.6%
Achieved ≥25% Loss
16.1%
78%
Achieved ≥10% Loss
67%
Similar
GI Side Effect Rate
Similar

The difference is substantial: 6.5 percentage points more weight loss with tirzepatide (p<0.001). For someone starting at 250 pounds, that's roughly an additional 16 pounds lost—50 pounds total versus 34 pounds.

At the high-response end, tirzepatide really separates: nearly twice as many patients achieved 25% or greater weight loss. That's surgical-level outcomes without surgery.

Why Does Tirzepatide Work Better? The Mechanism

Understanding why requires understanding what these drugs actually are:

Semaglutide Single GLP-1 Receptor Agonist

  • 94% structural similarity to natural GLP-1 hormone
  • Activates GLP-1 receptors in brain, pancreas, gut, heart
  • Reduces appetite, slows gastric emptying, improves insulin response
  • Half-life ~7 days (allows weekly dosing)

Tirzepatide Dual GIP/GLP-1 Receptor Agonist

  • Novel molecule that activates BOTH GIP and GLP-1 receptors
  • "Imbalanced" dual agonist: full GIP activation, partial GLP-1 activation
  • 5-fold lower GLP-1 receptor affinity than semaglutide
  • GIP component adds effects on fat tissue, additional satiety signaling
  • Half-life ~5 days

Here's what's counterintuitive: tirzepatide has weaker GLP-1 activity than semaglutide, yet produces more weight loss. The GIP component appears to be the key differentiator.

What GIP Adds

GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) has complex effects:

Tirzepatide also displays "biased agonism"—it preferentially activates certain signaling pathways (cAMP) over others (β-arrestin). This may reduce receptor desensitization, meaning the drug remains effective longer without the body adapting to it.

Diabetes Data: SURPASS-2

Before SURMOUNT-5, the SURPASS-2 trial compared tirzepatide to semaglutide 1mg (Ozempic dose, not Wegovy dose) in people with type 2 diabetes:

SURPASS-2: Tirzepatide vs Semaglutide 1mg (Type 2 Diabetes)

11.2 kg Tirzepatide 15mg weight loss
5.7 kg Semaglutide 1mg weight loss
2.30% Tirzepatide A1C reduction
1.86% Semaglutide A1C reduction

Tirzepatide doubled the weight loss and achieved better blood sugar control. The percentage reaching normal blood sugar (A1C <5.7%) was remarkable: 51% with tirzepatide 15mg versus 20% with semaglutide.

A caveat: SURPASS-2 used semaglutide 1mg, not 2.4mg. The comparison wasn't quite fair to semaglutide. SURMOUNT-5 used the proper weight-loss doses for both medications.

Breaking Down the Numbers Further

Responder Rates by Threshold

Weight Loss Achieved Tirzepatide 15mg Semaglutide 2.4mg
≥5% weight loss 91% 86%
≥10% weight loss 78% 67%
≥15% weight loss 64% 51%
≥20% weight loss 57% 32%
≥25% weight loss 32% 16%

At every threshold, tirzepatide outperforms. But notice that the gap widens at higher thresholds—tirzepatide is especially better at producing dramatic results. At the ≥20% mark (surgical-level outcomes), tirzepatide achieves nearly twice the success rate.

Non-Responder Rates

The flip side: how many people don't respond? Based on achieving less than 5% weight loss:

Tirzepatide has a higher success floor—fewer people fail to respond meaningfully.

Side Effect Comparison

Despite the efficacy differences, side effect profiles are remarkably similar:

Gastrointestinal Side Effects

~70% Any GI event (tirzepatide)
~70% Any GI event (semaglutide)
5-7% Discontinuation (tirzepatide)
5-7% Discontinuation (semaglutide)

Both medications cause nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, and constipation in similar proportions. Both have similar discontinuation rates. The tolerability profile is essentially equivalent—getting more weight loss doesn't mean getting more side effects.

Some patients report that tirzepatide "feels" gentler despite producing more weight loss. This may relate to the partial (versus full) GLP-1 receptor activation, though it's difficult to study systematically.

Muscle Loss: Does Tirzepatide Preserve More?

One of the most intriguing emerging differences: body composition. Early data suggests tirzepatide may preserve more lean mass during weight loss:

This is a meaningful difference. If you lose 50 pounds, that's either ~13 pounds of muscle (tirzepatide) or ~20-22 pounds of muscle (semaglutide). Better muscle preservation means:

Important caveat: These are cross-study comparisons, not head-to-head body composition data from the same trial. The GIP receptor may have direct effects on muscle preservation, or the populations may have differed. More research is needed to confirm this advantage.

Long-Term Data: Three Years of Tirzepatide

SURMOUNT-1 extension data now extends to 176 weeks (3.4 years)—the longest published data for tirzepatide:

SURMOUNT-1 Extension: Three-Year Results

24.2% Weight loss at 176 weeks
88% ≥10% loss maintained
0.4-2% Developed diabetes
13.3% Diabetes in placebo group

The sustained 24% weight loss at three years is remarkable. And the diabetes prevention is dramatic: only 0.4-2% of tirzepatide users developed diabetes versus 13.3% of placebo users.

Semaglutide's longest data is STEP 5 at 104 weeks, showing 15.2% sustained weight loss. The SELECT trial has 4+ years of follow-up but focused on cardiovascular outcomes rather than maximum weight loss.

Beyond Weight: Cardiovascular and Metabolic Effects

Cardiovascular Protection

Semaglutide has the evidence advantage here. The SELECT trial (17,604 patients) demonstrated a 20% reduction in major cardiovascular events (heart attack, stroke, cardiovascular death) with semaglutide. This led to FDA approval for cardiovascular risk reduction.

Tirzepatide doesn't yet have cardiovascular outcome trial results. The SURPASS-CVOT trial is ongoing but won't report until 2027. Based on the metabolic improvements tirzepatide produces, most experts expect similar or better cardiovascular benefits—but we don't have proof yet.

If cardiovascular protection is your primary goal and you have established heart disease, semaglutide currently has stronger evidence. If weight loss is the primary goal, tirzepatide produces better results.

Sleep Apnea

Tirzepatide is the first medication ever FDA-approved for obstructive sleep apnea. The SURMOUNT-OSA trial showed tirzepatide reduced the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) by 25.3 events per hour versus 5.3 with placebo. Many patients moved from severe to mild OSA or complete resolution.

Semaglutide hasn't been specifically studied for sleep apnea outcomes, though weight loss from any method improves OSA.

Liver Disease (NAFLD/NASH)

Both show remarkable effects on fatty liver disease:

Tirzepatide appears to have an edge for liver disease, though both are dramatically effective.

Practical Considerations

Cost Comparison (January 2026)

Option Tirzepatide Semaglutide
List Price (monthly) $1,086 (Zepbound) $1,349 (Wegovy)
Manufacturer Direct Program $399-449/month (LillyDirect vials) $499/month (NovoCare)
With Insurance (best case) $25-50/month $25/month
Compounded (where available) $200-400/month Restricted (shortage resolved)

Tirzepatide is slightly cheaper at list price and through manufacturer programs. Both are expensive without insurance or assistance programs.

Administration

Both are weekly subcutaneous injections with similar pen devices. Tirzepatide has a slightly shorter half-life (5 days vs 7 days), though both provide adequate coverage for weekly dosing.

Dose Titration

Semaglutide: 0.25mg → 0.5mg → 1.0mg → 1.7mg → 2.4mg (monthly increases)

Tirzepatide: 2.5mg → 5mg → 7.5mg → 10mg → 12.5mg → 15mg (monthly increases)

Tirzepatide has more dose options, allowing finer titration if side effects are limiting.

Switching Between Medications

What if you've been on one and want to try the other?

Semaglutide → Tirzepatide

This is the more common direction (seeking better results). Key points:

Tirzepatide → Semaglutide

Less common (usually due to cost or insurance). Same principles:

Who Might Choose Which?

Consider Tirzepatide If:

Consider Semaglutide If:

Either Is Excellent If:

The Bottom Line

Head-to-head, tirzepatide produces approximately 6.5 percentage points more weight loss than semaglutide—20% versus 13.7% in SURMOUNT-5. It achieves higher responder rates at every threshold and may preserve more muscle mass.

But semaglutide is no slouch. A 14-15% weight loss is still revolutionary compared to any previous medication. It has proven cardiovascular benefits, more years of safety data, and now an oral option.

The "better" choice depends on your specific situation: your health conditions, your goals, your insurance coverage, and what's available to you. Both medications represent genuine breakthroughs. Both can change lives.

The honest answer: If cost and access were equal, tirzepatide would be the default choice for most people seeking maximum weight loss. But cost and access aren't equal, and semaglutide remains an excellent, life-changing option. Having either available to you is the real win.

Ready to Explore Your Options?

Find providers who offer both tirzepatide and semaglutide and can help you choose.

Compare Providers